Oneness France

"Om Sat Chit Ananda Parabrahma Purushothama Paramatma

Sri Bhagavathi Sametha Sri Bhagavathe Namaha"

ONENESS replies media allegations

THE TRUTH

ABOUT

SRI

AMMA BHAGAVAN

"காண்பிக்கப்படுபவை எல்லாம் சத்யம் அல்ல. அவை உன் சொந்த அனுபவமானபோதே அது சத்யம். ஏனையவையெல்லாம் சத்யமல்ல.

--- ஸ்ரீ அம்மா பகவான்

<	NIJAMANA NIJAM TRUTH ABOUT SRI AMMA BHAGAVAN AND ONENESS UNIVERSITY

INTERVIEW with ONENESS GUIDES including NAMAN JI, PRADEEP JI and DEVOTEES, describing THEIR EXPERIENCES & TRANSFORMATIONS in response to recent false media campaign on oneness experiences.

HUNGER STRIKE WAS A GREAT SUCCESS

27/03/10

CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA

Namasthe

Chennai: The Madras high court today restrained about 30 private TV
channels in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu from telecasting clippings
pertaining to 'Kalki Bhagavan' and directed N K V Krishna, son of
Kalki, and a competent person in the ashram to file separate
affidavits 'highlighting, explaining, expounding and clarifying the
scenes found in the video clippings'.

Also:
In his order, justice G Rajasuria said he was granting the interim
injunction, effective till March 31, as in his opinion the victims, as
of now, 'have been projected in an identifiable manner to their
detriment and exfacie and prima facie that might be in violation of
human rights'.
The judge, however, made it clear that the injunction restrained the
TV channels from telecasting video clippings and not news items. 'The
respondent TV channels are at liberty to carry o:n with any news items
which are not defamatory', the judge said.

The judge directed that the two affidavits be filed taking into
consideration the importance involved in the case.

Issuing notice to the Centre and state governments, the judge also
directed additional solicitor general and state advocate general to
appear in court on March 31.

In his suit, Krishna sought a permanent injunction restraining the TV
channles from in any manner telecasting or publishing allegedly
untrue, defamatory material, totally unsubstantiated by facts and
documents either by direct or indirect references against him and his
family members.

The plaintiff contended that he and his family members 'are put to
great hardship and mental agony by the false, frivolous, concocted and
baseless allegations transmitted by the defendants' (TV channels).

Please forward this message to ALL